0 item(s) / Total: $0

All Products
View All
Air Tube Headsets
ElectraHealth Exclusives
Sales & Specials

EMF Meters
View All
Dirty Electricity Meters
Radiofrequency (RF) Wireless Meters
Electric Field (AC) Meters
Magnetic Field (AC) Meters
Body Voltage Meter Kits
Continuity Testers

View All
Phone Consultations
On-Site Inspection - Analysis - Remediation

View All
DNA Filters

Shielding Products
Shielding Paint
Bed Canopies
Shielding Fabrics

Power Cables & Adapters
View All
Power Strips
Extension Cords
Device Cords

View All
Wired and WiFi Routers
Ethernet LAN Cables
Grounding Adapters
Cat 6
Cat 7

Books and Videos

View All
Pro Meters
Pro Meter Accessories
Pro Miscellaneous
ElectraHealth EMF Newsletter with The EMF Explorer's Exclusive Content, Promotions, Specials Signup
Your Stetzerizer Filter purchase is covered by a 60 day no questions 100% satisfaction guarantee!!!
60 - Day 100% Satisfaction Guarantee on all Stetzerizer products!!!

Stetzerizer Filters do not wear out or ever need replacement. They are a one-time investment for a lifetime of healthier living.

Shopper Award

Cell phone radiation safety standards must be strengthened

Posted by Bob on 9/26/2013 to Wireless
Original Source

(NaturalNews) Twelve leading public health and consumer groups are calling on the U.S. government to review the current outdated and inadequate wireless safety standards to better protect both young people and adults from electromagnetic field exposures (EMF) from devices like cell phones, cordless phones, WiFi and other wireless technologies.

Public health organizations are demanding that the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) update its radiation standards to reflect current patterns of use and provide consumers with information about potential radiation exposure from cell phones and networks and that information at the point of sale of cell phones and similar devices be provided.

This initiative was signed by the Environmental Working Group (EWG) and 11 other public health organizations including: Breast Cancer Action, Breast Cancer Fund, Center for Health, Environment & Justice, Center for Environmental Health, Empire State Consumers Project, Healthy Child Healthy World, Product Policy Institute, Science and Environmental Health Network, and Teens Turning Green. The EWG also submitted to the FCC a 22 page document detailing extensive technical comments and outlining its concerns.

Existing safety standards outdated
Existing safety standards are now 17 years old. It was a different world back then. Few children owned or used a cell phone, smart phones didn't exist, and WiFi and similar technologies were virtually unheard of.

Today, things have moved on. In 2012, there were a reported 326 million cell phone subscribers in the U.S. - 10 times more than in 1997. A recent survey suggests 78 percent of children between the ages of 12 to 17 now own a cell phone. Almost half of the phones being sold today are smartphones, and 35 percent of all households in the U.S. are now Wireless-only.

While cell phone radiation and similar exposures are a concern for everyone, the health effects of these exposures are particularly worrying for our children.

Children most at risk
Existing safety standards fail to take into account the fact that children's brains absorb cell phone radiation differently than adult brains. Research carried out in the 1990s indicates that:

    Children are exposed to higher levels of radiation from cell phones than adults.
    Children have thinner skulls and smaller ears than adults.
    The radiation has a shorter distance to travel from the phone to the brain.
    Every millimeter of separation counts.

Consequently, more radiation gets to a child's brain and so exposure is increased.

Existing guidelines based on erroneous assumptions
Existing U.S. standards for wireless/radio frequency exposures are based on the erroneous assumption that EMFs have no biological effects unless there's a heating effect. And yet numerous studies have disproven this myth time and time again. As a recent expert panel on the subject of cell phones & WiFi concluded, "this radiation may be 'non-thermal', but [it] has clear and indisputable biological and health effects.....the exposure guidelines fail to protect about 97 percent of the population, most especially children."

Even sources within the government err on the side of caution. A 2012 U.S. Government Accountability Office report called on the FCC to update its cell phone radiation exposure guidelines. The government agency said that current standards "may not reflect the latest research" and "may not identify maximum exposure [to radiation] in all possible usage conditions." The agency also went on to say that it does not test the use of phones held against the body, which "could result in [radio frequency] energy exposure higher than the FCC limit."

In the absence of sufficiently protective standards, it's down to each individual to take the necessary steps to safeguard his or her health. Caring for our children is an absolute priority.

Sources for this article include:

About the author:
Lloyd Burrell is the author of a new ebook entitled "How To Beat Electrical Sensitivity" which offers a solution to the growing number of people whose health is being compromised by exposure to wireless and similar technologies, see www.electricsense.com/3-free-chapters.html

Since falling prey to a violent reaction to his cell phone in 2002 he has spent the last 10 years researching the effects of electromagnetic fields (EMFs) on health. He now offers a complete solution on how to live a healthy life in our increasingly electromagnetic world.
comments powered by Disqus

 The EMF Explorer
 Dirty Electricity
 "Smart" Meters

 Mobile phones are 'cooking' men's sperm
 Tips on How to Save Energy and Money without a ‘Smart’ Meter
 Families Punished by ‘Smart’ Meters and Time-Of-Use Rates, Recent Study Confirms
 TEDx Talk: “Wireless Wake-Up Call”
 A Message to Dads about Wireless Safety
 EMF Controversy Exposed
 Li-Fi has just been tested in the real world, and it's 100 times faster than Wi-Fi
 Electromagnetic Radiation Soup
 Effects of GSM EMR on permeability of blood-brain barrier in rats
 Psychiatric symptoms associated with exposure to non-ionizing EMR from mobile telephones
 Italian town shuts down school Wi-Fi over health fears
 Electromagnetic Radiation : ‘Wake-Up Call’ For Everyone
 Smart meters: boon or boondoggle?
 Summary of Evidence on Smart Meter Fires
 The REAL tin foil hat: RF protection for your head
 Study: EMF Radiation generated by mobile phone base stations associated with type 2 diabetes
 Protect yourself from health dangers of exposure to wireless networks
 Wait, so cell phones cause brain cancer after all?
 Study: Impairments in spinal cord of male offspring rats following exposure to a continuous 900-MHz EMF
 'Smart Meters:' Easy Targets for Hackers
 New Itron OpenWay Riva ‘Smart’ Meters Combine RF Mesh, PLC and Wi-Fi Communications and Poll Data Once per Second
 ‘Catastrophic’ Failures Expected with ‘Smart’ Meters
 Congressional Testimony: ‘Smart’ meters only have a life of 5 to 7 years
 T-Mobile wants to turn your house into a cell tower, and why you should think twice about letting them
 US pushes for spectrum for 5G, civil drones, flight tracking
 Study shows radioprotective effects of a natural leaf extract
 Practical Tips to Reduce Electromagnetic Radiation Exposure
 An Inside View of a "Smart" Meter
 Should babies and toddlers use mobile devices every day?
 4G/LTE in Unlicensed Bands - Adding Electromagnetic Radiation to an Airspace Near You

 March 2016
 February 2016
 January 2016
 December 2015
 November 2015
 October 2015
 September 2015
 August 2015
 July 2015
 June 2015
 May 2015
 April 2015
 March 2015
 February 2015
 January 2015
 December 2014
 November 2014
 October 2014
 September 2014
 August 2014
 July 2014
 June 2014
 May 2014
 April 2014
 March 2014
 February 2014
 January 2014
 December 2013
 November 2013
 October 2013
 September 2013
 August 2013
 July 2013
 June 2013
 May 2013
 April 2011