All Products
View All
Air Tube Headsets
ElectraHealth Exclusives
Sales & Specials

EMF Meters
View All
Dirty Electricity Meters
Radiofrequency (RF) Wireless Meters
Electric Field (AC) Meters
Magnetic Field (AC) Meters
Body Voltage Meter Kits

Services
View All
Phone Consultations
On-Site Inspection - Analysis - Remediation

Filters
View All
STETZERiZER Original
DNA Filters

Shielding Products
Shielding Paint
Bed Canopies
Shielding Fabrics

Power Cables & Adapters
View All
Power Strips
Extension Cords
Device Cords

Networking
View All
Wired and WiFi Routers
Ethernet LAN Cables
Grounding Adapters
Cat 6
Cat 7

Books and Videos

Professional
View All
Pro Meters
Pro Meter Accessories
Pro Miscellaneous
ElectraHealth EMF Newsletter with The EMF Explorer's Exclusive Content, Promotions, Specials Signup

RISK-FREE
Your Stetzerizer Filter purchase is covered by a 60 day no questions 100% satisfaction guarantee!!!
60 - Day 100% Satisfaction Guarantee on all Stetzerizer products!!!

Stetzerizer Filters do not wear out or ever need replacement. They are a one-time investment for a lifetime of healthier living.

Shopper Award



Would you prefer to make easy monthly payments on your order? We accept PayPal's Bill Me Later, allowing you 6 months interest free financing. Just place your order as normal, choose PayPal as the payment method, and follow the Bill Me Later link.

Group of Michigan energy customers wants out of smart meter program

Posted by Bob on 8/6/2013 to "Smart" Meters

JACKSON, MI – A group of Consumers Energy customers hopes to get rid of the utility’s opt-out fees for people who do not want smart meters installed on their homes.

The group of West Michigan residents, led by Michelle Rison, believes smart meters bring health risks and say the harm of smart meter emissions have been studied by scientists and medical professionals.

On July 25, the group filed a claim of appeal with the Michigan Court of Appeals on a state order that will allow Consumers Energy to charge an opt-out fee for those who choose not to have smart meters installed on their homes.

Consumers Energy can charge customers who do not want to participate in the smart meter program with a one-time fee of about $69, according to an order issued June 28 by the Michigan Public Service Commission. For those who want an existing smart meter to be removed for a more traditional meter, Consumers Energy can charge them a one-time fee of about $124.

For all of those in the opt-out program using traditional meters that need monthly reading by Consumers Energy employees, the additional charge will be $9.72 a month, according to the MPSC order.

The additional opt-out charges are justified in covering the additional cost of the company to provide the special equipment and service, according to the MPSC ruling.

A representative from the MPSC was not immediately available for comment Thursday afternoon.

In the press release, the appellants say the World Health Organization/International Agency for Research on Cancer classified radio-frequency electromagnetic fields as “possibly carcinogenic” to humans based on an increased risk of brain cancer associated with wireless phone use.

The group also cited privacy issues and interference with medical implants and believe the smart meters will not save money and are not environmentally friendly.

Consumers Energy officials dispute those claims of health and privacy risks, saying smart meters are safe, secure and give an array of benefits to customers.

More than 40 million smart meters already have been installed in the United States, with public service commissions in many states supporting their use as safe and effective upgrades to older technology, said Dennis McKee, communications director for Consumers Energy’s Smart Energy Program.

He said the smart meters reflect the changing needs and lifestyles of customers who want more information and taking more control of their energy use.

Only about 1.05 percent of Consumers Energy customers in the areas receiving smart meters have expressed interest in keeping their older meters, McKee said.

“Smart meters are safe, secure products that help to enhance customer service and control energy costs,” he said in an email. “Unfortunately, the group cites erroneous information and research to leap to conclusions.”

The Michigan Public Service Commission issued a report in July 2012 that said this technology has little health risk and outdoes the current meter system.

The appellants want to preserve customers’ rights to keep and/or restore their analog meters and have the fees eliminated. They feel the opt-out fees are unfair and create a hardship for those on fixed incomes.

“Should the appeal succeed, the MPSC will be ordered to reopen the case to hear the dangers of smart meter evidence, which they have up to now refused,” according to a statement from the group. “As awareness grows and this topic is better understood, people begin to connect the dots to threats to their individual freedoms and their deteriorating health.”

Rison, the lead appellant in the case, was not immediately available for comment Thursday afternoon.

The smart-meter technology is a $750 million investment for Consumers Energy, which says smart meters will allow residents to see exactly how much energy they are using on a real-time basis and adjust usage to cut monthly bills.

So far, more than 100,000 installations have been completed in Muskegon, Oceana, Ottawa and Allegan counties on the west side of state, and the utility’s 1.8 million electric meters in residential homes and small businesses are expected to have smart meter technology by 2019.
comments powered by Disqus

 The EMF Explorer
 Dirty Electricity
 "Smart" Meters
 Wireless

 Mobile phones are 'cooking' men's sperm
 Tips on How to Save Energy and Money without a ‘Smart’ Meter
 Families Punished by ‘Smart’ Meters and Time-Of-Use Rates, Recent Study Confirms
 TEDx Talk: “Wireless Wake-Up Call”
 A Message to Dads about Wireless Safety
 EMF Controversy Exposed
 Li-Fi has just been tested in the real world, and it's 100 times faster than Wi-Fi
 Electromagnetic Radiation Soup
 Effects of GSM EMR on permeability of blood-brain barrier in rats
 Psychiatric symptoms associated with exposure to non-ionizing EMR from mobile telephones
 Italian town shuts down school Wi-Fi over health fears
 Electromagnetic Radiation : ‘Wake-Up Call’ For Everyone
 Smart meters: boon or boondoggle?
 Summary of Evidence on Smart Meter Fires
 The REAL tin foil hat: RF protection for your head
 Study: EMF Radiation generated by mobile phone base stations associated with type 2 diabetes
 Protect yourself from health dangers of exposure to wireless networks
 Wait, so cell phones cause brain cancer after all?
 Study: Impairments in spinal cord of male offspring rats following exposure to a continuous 900-MHz EMF
 'Smart Meters:' Easy Targets for Hackers
 New Itron OpenWay Riva ‘Smart’ Meters Combine RF Mesh, PLC and Wi-Fi Communications and Poll Data Once per Second
 ‘Catastrophic’ Failures Expected with ‘Smart’ Meters
 Congressional Testimony: ‘Smart’ meters only have a life of 5 to 7 years
 T-Mobile wants to turn your house into a cell tower, and why you should think twice about letting them
 US pushes for spectrum for 5G, civil drones, flight tracking
 Study shows radioprotective effects of a natural leaf extract
 Practical Tips to Reduce Electromagnetic Radiation Exposure
 An Inside View of a "Smart" Meter
 Should babies and toddlers use mobile devices every day?
 4G/LTE in Unlicensed Bands - Adding Electromagnetic Radiation to an Airspace Near You

 March 2016
 February 2016
 January 2016
 December 2015
 November 2015
 October 2015
 September 2015
 August 2015
 July 2015
 June 2015
 May 2015
 April 2015
 March 2015
 February 2015
 January 2015
 December 2014
 November 2014
 October 2014
 September 2014
 August 2014
 July 2014
 June 2014
 May 2014
 April 2014
 March 2014
 February 2014
 January 2014
 December 2013
 November 2013
 October 2013
 September 2013
 August 2013
 July 2013
 June 2013
 May 2013
 April 2011