All Products
View All
Air Tube Headsets
ElectraHealth Exclusives
Sales & Specials

EMF Meters
View All
Dirty Electricity Meters
Radiofrequency (RF) Wireless Meters
Electric Field (AC) Meters
Magnetic Field (AC) Meters
Body Voltage Meter Kits

Services
View All
Phone Consultations
On-Site Inspection - Analysis - Remediation

Filters
View All
STETZERiZER Original
DNA Filters

Shielding Products
Shielding Paint
Bed Canopies
Shielding Fabrics

Power Cables & Adapters
View All
Power Strips
Extension Cords
Device Cords

Networking
View All
Wired and WiFi Routers
Ethernet LAN Cables
Grounding Adapters
Cat 6
Cat 7

Books and Videos

Professional
View All
Pro Meters
Pro Meter Accessories
Pro Miscellaneous
ElectraHealth EMF Newsletter with The EMF Explorer's Exclusive Content, Promotions, Specials Signup

RISK-FREE
Your Stetzerizer Filter purchase is covered by a 60 day no questions 100% satisfaction guarantee!!!
60 - Day 100% Satisfaction Guarantee on all Stetzerizer products!!!

Stetzerizer Filters do not wear out or ever need replacement. They are a one-time investment for a lifetime of healthier living.

Shopper Award



Would you prefer to make easy monthly payments on your order? We accept PayPal's Bill Me Later, allowing you 6 months interest free financing. Just place your order as normal, choose PayPal as the payment method, and follow the Bill Me Later link.

If 'smart' meters are such a great idea, why are utilities forcing them on customers?

Posted by Bob on 12/30/2013 to "Smart" Meters
Original Source

Electrahealth.com Editor's Note: We have seen video evidence of installed 'smart' meters broadcasting much more frequently with much more power than utilities claim. We have seen evidence of utilities using force to deploy smart meters. If 'smart' meters are such a great idea, if they really are a benign power company device, if they really are no threat to human health, why are utilities using force to deploy them?


















Joe Esposito with his protective Faraday cage

AEP-PSO, which plans to install more than 500,000 smart meters system wide over the next few years, denies that those devices emit radio frequency radiation at a high enough level to make people sick.

One of the Tulsa-based utility's customers, and apparently others who are battling the state's largest utility - OG&E - over similar issues, say otherwise.

"There's not one study to prove it's safe," Owasso resident Joe Esposito said in a call from his cellphone Friday. "It's killing people."

On the contrary, American Electric Power-Public Service Co. of Oklahoma says the studies prove that the RF signal from smart meters is safe. An Edison Electric Institute study in 2011 indicated that the RF level is multiple times less than that emitted by other devices, the utility says.

"The scientific evidence does not support that concern from those opposed to smart meters," said AEP-PSO spokesman Stan Whiteford. "The strength (of the radio frequency) is less than what you find in baby monitors and certainly cellphones. ... The concern is kind of misplaced."

AEP-PSO will spend $120 million to replace all 520,000 existing meters system wide with advanced devices by 2016. The utility already has rolled out pilot programs for smart meters in Owasso, Sand Springs, Okmulgee and the University of Tulsa.

The intent of smart-meter technology is to promote energy efficiency. Once installed, the devices can provide real-time data online to allow customers to better control energy usage.

Opponents fear that those smart meters, which use radio frequency to communicate the data, are making them sick. KFOR-TV in Oklahoma City aired a report last summer featuring OG&E customers who complained of nosebleeds and other ailments after the advanced devices were installed.

OG&E spokesman Brian Alford echoed Whiteford's comments on the safety of smart meters, noting they were usually only on for several minutes a day.
"We have great confidence in the technology," Alford said. "It meets all the standards of the FCC (Federal Communication Commission)."

The KFOR report also featured Esposito. On Friday he recounted the experience of feeling pain in his mouth and groin immediately after AEP-PSO installed smart meters in Owasso in 2011.

Esposito crafted a sheet of lead around the meter to block the radio emissions. He also has built a "Faraday cage," which is aluminum screening that blocks emissions, to protect himself and his family in their home.

"I didn't need a pharmaceutical for my leg or my teeth," he said. "I just need to stop the radiation."

Some counties in California and other entities have either banned smart-meter installation or are examining the issue. Other studies have found the devices less harmful, including a 2011 "White Paper" from the Edison Electric Institute.

Radio frequency radiation exposure drops "significantly" as distance from the transmitter increases, the EEI study found.

"Smart Meter exposures even at close range and with exaggerated duty cycle are many times less than other household devices and are compliant with FCC limitations," the study states.

In fact, it added by paraphrasing from an earlier California study that radio frequency exposure "of a person talking on a cell phone and a person 3 and 10 feet from a continuously operating smart meter would result in Smart Meter RF exposure of 125 to 1250 times less exposure than the cell phone."

Esposito isn't buying it. He said utilities have a vested interest in rolling out the wireless meters.

"If you really understand what's happening here, it's deception," he said. "There's a lot of money in this."

Indeed, AEP-PSO's $120 million price tag for the smart meters will likely be passed on to customers after the devices are fully rolled out in 2016.

Whiteford noted that AEP-PSO and other utilities are aware of the health concerns and believe the overwhelming evidence would debunk any fears if people would pay attention to the facts.

"These meters have one of the weakest RF signals," he said.

Smart meters already are installed at millions of sites nationwide and overseas.

Another criticism, independent of health concerns, is that the devices do not produce enough energy savings to make them worth the cost.
comments powered by Disqus

 The EMF Explorer
 Dirty Electricity
 "Smart" Meters
 Wireless

 Mobile phones are 'cooking' men's sperm
 Tips on How to Save Energy and Money without a ‘Smart’ Meter
 Families Punished by ‘Smart’ Meters and Time-Of-Use Rates, Recent Study Confirms
 TEDx Talk: “Wireless Wake-Up Call”
 A Message to Dads about Wireless Safety
 EMF Controversy Exposed
 Li-Fi has just been tested in the real world, and it's 100 times faster than Wi-Fi
 Electromagnetic Radiation Soup
 Effects of GSM EMR on permeability of blood-brain barrier in rats
 Psychiatric symptoms associated with exposure to non-ionizing EMR from mobile telephones
 Italian town shuts down school Wi-Fi over health fears
 Electromagnetic Radiation : ‘Wake-Up Call’ For Everyone
 Smart meters: boon or boondoggle?
 Summary of Evidence on Smart Meter Fires
 The REAL tin foil hat: RF protection for your head
 Study: EMF Radiation generated by mobile phone base stations associated with type 2 diabetes
 Protect yourself from health dangers of exposure to wireless networks
 Wait, so cell phones cause brain cancer after all?
 Study: Impairments in spinal cord of male offspring rats following exposure to a continuous 900-MHz EMF
 'Smart Meters:' Easy Targets for Hackers
 New Itron OpenWay Riva ‘Smart’ Meters Combine RF Mesh, PLC and Wi-Fi Communications and Poll Data Once per Second
 ‘Catastrophic’ Failures Expected with ‘Smart’ Meters
 Congressional Testimony: ‘Smart’ meters only have a life of 5 to 7 years
 T-Mobile wants to turn your house into a cell tower, and why you should think twice about letting them
 US pushes for spectrum for 5G, civil drones, flight tracking
 Study shows radioprotective effects of a natural leaf extract
 Practical Tips to Reduce Electromagnetic Radiation Exposure
 An Inside View of a "Smart" Meter
 Should babies and toddlers use mobile devices every day?
 4G/LTE in Unlicensed Bands - Adding Electromagnetic Radiation to an Airspace Near You

 March 2016
 February 2016
 January 2016
 December 2015
 November 2015
 October 2015
 September 2015
 August 2015
 July 2015
 June 2015
 May 2015
 April 2015
 March 2015
 February 2015
 January 2015
 December 2014
 November 2014
 October 2014
 September 2014
 August 2014
 July 2014
 June 2014
 May 2014
 April 2014
 March 2014
 February 2014
 January 2014
 December 2013
 November 2013
 October 2013
 September 2013
 August 2013
 July 2013
 June 2013
 May 2013
 April 2011