All Products
View All
Air Tube Headsets
ElectraHealth Exclusives
Sales & Specials

EMF Meters
View All
Dirty Electricity Meters
Radiofrequency (RF) Wireless Meters
Electric Field (AC) Meters
Magnetic Field (AC) Meters
Body Voltage Meter Kits

Services
View All
Phone Consultations
On-Site Inspection - Analysis - Remediation

Filters
View All
STETZERiZER Original
DNA Filters

Shielding Products
Shielding Paint
Bed Canopies
Shielding Fabrics

Power Cables & Adapters
View All
Power Strips
Extension Cords
Device Cords

Networking
View All
Wired and WiFi Routers
Ethernet LAN Cables
Grounding Adapters
Cat 6
Cat 7

Books and Videos

Professional
View All
Pro Meters
Pro Meter Accessories
Pro Miscellaneous
ElectraHealth EMF Newsletter with The EMF Explorer's Exclusive Content, Promotions, Specials Signup

RISK-FREE
Your Stetzerizer Filter purchase is covered by a 60 day no questions 100% satisfaction guarantee!!!
60 - Day 100% Satisfaction Guarantee on all Stetzerizer products!!!

Stetzerizer Filters do not wear out or ever need replacement. They are a one-time investment for a lifetime of healthier living.

Shopper Award



Would you prefer to make easy monthly payments on your order? We accept PayPal's Bill Me Later, allowing you 6 months interest free financing. Just place your order as normal, choose PayPal as the payment method, and follow the Bill Me Later link.

The Smart Meter Nightmare Scenario

Posted by Bob on 6/10/2014 to "Smart" Meters
Original Source


Nick Hunn [1]  is a wireless technology expert who is quite skeptical of the purported benefits of smart meters and the current level of smart grid system security.  He recently  wrote an article entitled, “When Smart Meters Get Hacked” (June 8, 2014).  What follows are some selected quotations from his article dealing primarily with the smart meter “feature” of remote disconnect:

“There‘s a lot of talk about grid security and data privacy in the energy industry, but very little about the consequences of what happens if smart meters go wrong.  By going wrong, I don‘t just mean people attempting to hack their meters to reduce their bills.  That will probably happen.  I‘m more interested in the nightmare scenario when several million electricity meters suddenly disconnect. [emphasis added]


Whenever I’ve asked a utility about what they’d do if a million meters disconnected, the only response I’ve had is a puzzled look and the reply that ‘that can’t happen’.  It probably won’t, but it could.  If it does, the economic effect on the country would be disastrous.  It’s probably the most effective terrorist attack available. …

In theory only the utility has access to the relay in your meter and they claim to have a secure system.  But that’s not strictly true.  There is a threat where a rogue programmer working for the meter manufacturer could insert some additional code which would disconnect the meter at a specified day in the future.  That threat is very low but maybe not as low as it should be.  If this happens, the consequences are catastrophic. …

All they need to do is to insert a few lines of code into the firmware for a smart meter which will disconnect the meter at some specific time in the future.  For best effect, they’d set that to be during a peak time, …  The code needs to disconnect the power at that point and also disable the remote connection back to the utility, so that they can’t communicate with the meter to try and restart it.  A competent programmer should be able to write that in about ten minutes.  As the same code goes into all millions of meters from each supplier, millions would turn off together.

Bringing power back after one of these events is difficult.  If enough power stations have shut down, the grid needs to perform what’s called a black start. …

Which brings us back to the underlying issue.  Has anyone ever looked at the balance of risk between the convenience of being able to remotely disconnect a meter, and the potential of that being misused to destroy the entire national grid? …  It’s time somebody stood back and asked ‘What if?’”

For the complete article, refer to: http://www.nickhunn.com/when-smart-meters-get-hacked/

Nick Hunn has also written a Creative Commons work, entitled, “Smart Metering is FCUKED.”  Here are a few of quotes from this document:

“Even when smart meters are deployed, there is no evidence that any utility will use the resulting data to transform their business, rather than persecute the consumer.  At a recent US conference a senior executive for a US utility which had deployed smart meters, stated that their main benefit was ‘to give them more evidence to blame the customer’.  That’s a good description of the attitude displayed by our utilities. … [emphasis added]

There is an obsession to make ‘smart’ meters do things which are far better done over other channels, such as demand response and consumer engagement.  But because the industry is so technically backward, it’s picked an architecture that is several decades out of date and which cannot deliver the information in the way which customers want.  Today consumers have smartphones.  They want the same sort of smart experience from their utility.  Instead they’re going to get a retro ‘70’s technology experience, whilst paying twenty-first century prices for it.  It’s a back to front world, where utilities are leading the Government down a path that it and consumers will regret. …

The real risk comes when every meter is capable of disconnecting the user.  Simply reading meters generates privacy and billing issues, but the damage is likely to be restricted to a number of individuals.  When you allow remote disconnections, the risk moves to another dimension.  The paper ‘Who controls the off switch’ [17] highlights the risk of a hacker or disgruntled employee turning off a large number of meters. That sudden change would cause immense damage to the grid and components within it, as well as removing power from millions of users.  The resultant cost would be immense.  As the paper explains, ‘this is the cyber equivalent of a nuclear strike; when electricity stops, then pretty much everything else does too.’” [emphasis added]

[17] “Who Controls the Off Switch,” by Ross Anderson & Shailendra Fukoria, Cambridge University, http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rja14/Papers/meters-offswitch.pdf

To more fully quote the paper referenced by [17] above:

“From the viewpoint of a cyber attacker – whether a hostile government agency, a terrorist organisation or even a militant environmental group – the ideal attack on a target country is to interrupt its citizens’ electricity supply. … Until now, the only plausible ways to do that involved attacks on critical generation, transmission and distribution assets, which are increasingly well defended.  Smart meters change the game.”

“Electricity and gas supplies might be disrupted on a massive scale by failures of smart meters, whether as a result of cyberattack or simply from software errors.  The introduction of hundreds of millions of these meters in North America and Europe over the next ten years, each containing a remotely commanded off switch, remote software upgrade and complex functionality, creates a shocking vulnerability.  An attacker who takes over the control facility or who takes over the meters directly could create widespread blackouts; a software bug could do the same.”

Lack of forethought and misguided objectives in deploying smart meters could very well result in the nightmare scenario described above in the not too distant future.  There may still be time to turn back and avoid catastrophic outcomes, but the government, utilities, and the smart grid industry do not yet appear willing to protect us or themselves against catastrophic events.

[1]  Nick Hunn has over twenty years experience in the area of mobile and wireless communications and ten additional years in product design.  Although Mr. Hunn  possesses considerable experience in the field of wireless connectivity, his writings do not appear to express any particular knowledge or concern regarding potential health risks related to the use of wireless technology as frequently discussed elsewhere on this website.

For other relevant blog articles on the topic of smart grid cyber threats, refer to:



comments powered by Disqus

 The EMF Explorer
 Dirty Electricity
 "Smart" Meters
 Wireless

 Mobile phones are 'cooking' men's sperm
 Tips on How to Save Energy and Money without a ‘Smart’ Meter
 Families Punished by ‘Smart’ Meters and Time-Of-Use Rates, Recent Study Confirms
 TEDx Talk: “Wireless Wake-Up Call”
 A Message to Dads about Wireless Safety
 EMF Controversy Exposed
 Li-Fi has just been tested in the real world, and it's 100 times faster than Wi-Fi
 Electromagnetic Radiation Soup
 Effects of GSM EMR on permeability of blood-brain barrier in rats
 Psychiatric symptoms associated with exposure to non-ionizing EMR from mobile telephones
 Italian town shuts down school Wi-Fi over health fears
 Electromagnetic Radiation : ‘Wake-Up Call’ For Everyone
 Smart meters: boon or boondoggle?
 Summary of Evidence on Smart Meter Fires
 The REAL tin foil hat: RF protection for your head
 Study: EMF Radiation generated by mobile phone base stations associated with type 2 diabetes
 Protect yourself from health dangers of exposure to wireless networks
 Wait, so cell phones cause brain cancer after all?
 Study: Impairments in spinal cord of male offspring rats following exposure to a continuous 900-MHz EMF
 'Smart Meters:' Easy Targets for Hackers
 New Itron OpenWay Riva ‘Smart’ Meters Combine RF Mesh, PLC and Wi-Fi Communications and Poll Data Once per Second
 ‘Catastrophic’ Failures Expected with ‘Smart’ Meters
 Congressional Testimony: ‘Smart’ meters only have a life of 5 to 7 years
 T-Mobile wants to turn your house into a cell tower, and why you should think twice about letting them
 US pushes for spectrum for 5G, civil drones, flight tracking
 Study shows radioprotective effects of a natural leaf extract
 Practical Tips to Reduce Electromagnetic Radiation Exposure
 An Inside View of a "Smart" Meter
 Should babies and toddlers use mobile devices every day?
 4G/LTE in Unlicensed Bands - Adding Electromagnetic Radiation to an Airspace Near You

 March 2016
 February 2016
 January 2016
 December 2015
 November 2015
 October 2015
 September 2015
 August 2015
 July 2015
 June 2015
 May 2015
 April 2015
 March 2015
 February 2015
 January 2015
 December 2014
 November 2014
 October 2014
 September 2014
 August 2014
 July 2014
 June 2014
 May 2014
 April 2014
 March 2014
 February 2014
 January 2014
 December 2013
 November 2013
 October 2013
 September 2013
 August 2013
 July 2013
 June 2013
 May 2013
 April 2011